|сгенерировать QR код
Открытый доступ
Только для подписчиков
Реформы российского образования и экономическая теория
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2005-3-4-19
Аннотация
В статье сопоставляются основные направления изменений в экономическом механизме среднего образования в России, некоторые положения современной экономической теории, а также результаты анализа зарубежных реформ, нацеленных на усиление конкуренции между школами. Показано, что ожидания повышения качества отечественного среднего образования, связанные с изменениями в экономическом механизме, являются во многом ошибочными: и положения теории, и зарубежный опыт свидетельствуют о существовании серьезных рисков снижения качества образования как следствии усиления конкуренции между школами.
Об авторе
В. Тамбовцев
МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова
Россия
доктор экономических наук, профессор экономического факультета
Россия
доктор экономических наук, профессор экономического факультета
Список литературы
1. Акерлоф Дж. Рынок "лимонов": неопределенность качества и рыночный механизм // THESIS, 1994, № 5, с. 91-104.
2. Кузьминов Я. Реформа образования: причины и цели // Отечественные записки, 2002, № 1.
3. Уильямсон О. Экономические институты капитализма. СПб.: Лениздат, 1996.
4. Acemoglu D., Kremer M., Mian A. Incentives in Markets, Firms and Governments // NBER Working Paper 9802, June 2003.
5. Akerlof G. The Market for "Lemons": Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism // Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970, vol.84, p. 488-500.
6. Bast J., Walberg H. Can Parents Choose the Best Schools for Their Children? - Economics of Education Review, 2004, vol. 23, p. 431-440.
7. Bonesronning H. Can Effective Teacher Behavior be Identified? - Economics of Education Review, 2004, vol. 23, p. 237-247.
8. Brouillette M. School Choice in Michigan: A Primer for Freedom in Education. Midland, Michigan: Mackinac Center for Public Policy, 1999. http://www.mackinac.org/article.asp?ID=2027.
9. Chan W. Competition and Public School Performance: An Empirical Analysis using Data from Ontario. University of Toronto, November 2003 (mimeo).
10. Chang-Tai H., Urquiola M. When Schools Compete, How Do They Compete? An Assessment of Chile's Nationwide School Voucher Program. NBER Working Paper 10008, September 2003.
11. Correa H., Gruver G. Teacher-Student interaction: A Game-Theoretic Extension of the Economic Theory of Education // Mathematical Social Science, 1987, vol. 13, p. 19-47.
12. Darby M., Karni E. Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud // Journal of Law and Economics, 1973, vol. 16, p. 67-88.
13. Dixit A. Incentives and Organizations in the Public Sector: An Interpretative Review // Journal of Human Resources, 2002, vol.37, No 4, p. 696-727.
14. Eberts R., Hollenbeck K., Stone J. Teacher Performance Incentives and Student Outcomes // Journal of Human Resources, 2002, vol.37, No 4, p. 913-927.
15. Friedman M. The Role of Government in Education. In: M. Friedman (ed.). Capitalism and Freedom (ch. VI). Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1962.
16. Geller C., Sjoquist D., Walker M. The Effect of Private School Competition on Public School Performance. Georgia State University, June 2003.
17. Hanushek E., Rivkin S., Kain J. Teachers, Schools and Academic Achievement. NBER Working Paper No 6691, 2001.
18. Hirshleifer J., Riley J. The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information // Journal of Economic Literature, 1979, vol. 17, p. 1375-1421.
19. Holmes G., DeSimone J., Rupp N. Does School Choice Increase School Quality? East Carolina University, Department of Economics, Working Paper, 2003, March 4.
20. Howe K. Understanding Equal Educational Opportunity: Social Justice, Democracy and Schooling. New York, Teachers College Press, 1997.
21. Jacob B. Accountability, Incentives and Behavior: The Impact of High-Stakes Testing in the Chicago Public Schools. NBER Working Paper 8968, June 2002.
22. Jacob B., Levitt S. Catching Cheating Teacher: The Results of an Unusual Experiment in Implementing Theory. NBER Working Paper 9414, December 2002.
23. Le Grand J., Bartlett W. (eds.). Quasi-Markets and Social Policy. Houndmills, Macmillan, 1993.
24. Levacic R. An Analysis of Competition and Its Impact on Secondary School Examination Performance in England. Teacher College, Columbia University, Occasional Paper No 34, September 2001.
25. Levitt S. Rotten Apples: An Investigation of the Prevalence and Predictors of Teacher Cheating. University of California, Berkeley Olin Program in Law and Economics. Working Paper No 79, 2002.
26. Millimet D., Collier T. Efficiency in Public Schools: Does Competition Matter? Southern Methodist University, Dallas, February 2004 (mimeo).
27. Nelson P. Information and Consumer Behaviour // Journal of Political Economy, 1970, vol. 78, p. 311-329.
28. Peterson P., Hassel B. (eds.). Learning from School Choice. Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press, 1998.
29. Sandstrom F., Bergstrom F. School Vouchers in Practice: Competition Won't Hurt You! The Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Stockholm, Working Paper No. 578, 2002.
30. Schneider M. et al. Shopping for Schools: In the Land of the Blind, The One-Eyed Parent May Be Enough // American Journal of Political Science, 1998, vol. 42, No 3, p. 769-793.
31. Shepard L., Dougherty K. Effect of High-Stakes Testing on Instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, April 1991.
32. Spence M. Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1974.
33. Stiglitz J. Information and Economic Analysis. In: Parkin J., Nobay A. (eds.). Current Economic Problems. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1975, p. 27-52.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Тамбовцев В. Реформы российского образования и экономическая теория. Вопросы экономики. 2005;(3):4-19. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2005-3-4-19
For citation:
Tambovtsev V. Economics and Reforms of Russia’s Education. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2005;(3):4-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2005-3-4-19
Просмотров:
599
Послать статью по эл. почте 
