Preview

Войти

Регистрация нового пользователя Забыли Ваш пароль?

Вопросы экономики

Расширенный поиск
Доступ открыт Открытый доступ  Доступ закрыт Только для подписчиков

Будущее плюралистичной институциональной теории

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-4-45-69

Аннотация

В статье подвергаются критике устойчивые стереотипы о современном состоянии и логике развития институциональной экономики. Эти стереотипы основаны на недооценке роста ее внутреннего разнообразия, размывании методологических границ новой и оригинальной институциональных экономических теорий (НИЭТ и ОИЭТ), возникновении многочисленных альтернативных институционализмов. Анализ истории развития ОИЭТ и НИЭТ показывает, что их конкуренция прекратилась, сменившись методологическим обменом, а исследовательские программы становятся все более неоднородными и эклектичными. Большое значение приобретают альтернативные институционализмы — междисциплинарные течения, посвященные новым трендам в анализе институтов. Предлагается перейти от нарратива о борьбе НИЭТ и ОИЭТ к переосмыслению институциональной экономики как континуума коэволюционирующих и взаимодополняющих школ и подходов. Приводятся аргументы в пользу сценария формирования институциональной теории, базирующейся на эпистемологическом плюрализме, сочетании качественных и количественных методов, переходе к постдисциплинарности. Плюралистичная парадигма может стать адекватным ответом на вызов качественного роста институциональной сложности экономики.

Об авторе

Д. П. Фролов
Волгоградский государственный технический университет
Россия

Фролов Даниил Петрович, доктор экономических наук, профессор кафедры экономики и предпринимательства

Волгоград


Список литературы

1. Автономов В. С. (2013). Абстракция — мать порядка? (историко-методологические рассуждения о связи экономической науки и экономической политики) // Вопросы экономики. № 4. С. 4—23. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-4-4-23

2. Вольчик В. В. (2020). Нарративы и понимание экономических институтов // Terra Economicus. Т. 18, № 2. С. 49—69.

3. Норт Д. (1997). Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. М.: Фонд экономической книги «Начала».

4. Тамбовцев В. Л. (2020). Непродуктивность попыток методологического синтеза // Вопросы теоретической экономики. № 3. С. 7—31.

5. Тамбовцев В. Л. (2021a). Возможна ли единая институциональная экономическая теория? // Вопросы экономики. № 1. С. 33—51. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-33-51

6. Тамбовцев В. Л. (2021b). Институционализмы в экономической науке: что стоит за их разнообразием? // Журнал институциональных исследований. Т. 13, № 1. С. 20—36. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2021.13.1.020-036

7. Тутов Л. А., Шаститко А. Е. (2021). Метаязык внутридисциплинарного дискурса для научно-исследовательских программ: приглашение к разговору // Вопросы экономики. № 4. С. 96—115. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-4-96-115

8. Фролов Д. П. (2020). Постинституционализм: за пределами институционального мейнстрима // Вопросы экономики. № 5. С. 107—140. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-5-107-140

9. Ходжсон Дж. М. (2003). Экономическая теория и институты: Манифест современной институциональной экономической теории. М.: Дело.

10. Alston E., Law W., Murtazashvili I., Weiss M. (2022). Blockchain networks as constitutional and competitive polycentric orders. Journal of Institutional Economics, [forthcoming]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413742100093X

11. Avtonomov V., Avtonomov Y. (2019). Four Methodenstreits between behavioral and mainstream economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 179—194.

12. Bates R. H., Greif A., Levi M., Rosenthal J.-L., Weingast B. R. (1998). Analytic narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

13. Boldyrev I., Svetlova E. (eds.) (2016). Enacting dismal science: New perspectives on the performativity of economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

14. Breit W., De Gregori T. R., Gruchy A. G., Hamilton D. (1976). Thorstein Veblen and the institutionalists. A study in the social philosophy of economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 943—957. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624. 1976.11503397

15. Burns S., Fuller C. S. (2020). Institutions and entrepreneurship: Pushing the boundaries. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 23, No. 3—4, pp. 568—612. https://doi.org/10.35297/qjae.010080

16. Cardinale I. (2018). Beyond constraining and enabling: Toward new microfoundations for institutional theory. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 132—155. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0020

17. Casas-Klett T., Li J. (2021). Assessing the Belt and Road Initiative as a narrative: Implications for institutional change and international firm strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, pp. 1—17.

18. Cleaver F. D., de Koning J. (2015). Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1—18. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.605

19. Coase R. H. (1984). The new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 140, No. 1, pp. 229—231.

20. Coase R. H. (1988). The firm, the market and the law. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

21. Cornelissen J. P., Durand R., Fiss P. C., Lammers J. C., Vaara E. (2015). Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 10—27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0381

22. Courvisanos J., Doughney J., Millmow A. (eds.) (2016). Reclaiming pluralism in economics. London, New York: Routledge.

23. D’Amico D., Martin A. (2022). Introduction to the symposium on institutional analysis, market processes, and interdisciplinary social science. Journal of Institutional Economics, [forthcoming]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000941

24. Davidson S., De Filippi P., Potts J. (2018). Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 639—658. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137417000200

25. De Vries P. (2022). New institutional economics as situational logic. New York: Routledge [forthcoming].

26. DiMaggio P. (1998). The new institutionalisms: Avenues of collaboration. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 154, No. 4, pp. 696—705.

27. Dopfer K., Foster J., Potts J. (2004). Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 263—279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0193-0

28. Elsner W. (2010). The process and a simple logic of ‘meso’. Emergence and the co-evolution of institutions and group size. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 445—477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-009-0158-4

29. Frolov D. (2021). Blockchain and the institutional complexity: An extended institutional approach. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 21—36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000272

30. Frolov D. (2022). Crafting cognitive institutions for overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Institutional Economics, [forthcoming]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137422000030

31. Gallagher S. (2020). Action and interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

32. Gräbner C. (2015). Agent-based computational models — a formal heuristic for institutionalist pattern modelling? Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 241—261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137415000193

33. Gräbner C., Kapeller J. (2015). New perspectives on institutionalist pattern modeling: Systemism, complexity, and agent-based modeling. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 433—440. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2015.1042765

34. Gräbner C., Strunk B. (2020). Pluralism in economics: Its critiques and their lessons. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 311—329.

35. Grandori A. (2021). Pushing the boundaries of Williamson’s ‘science of economic organization’ — knowledge and pluralism challenges. Unpublished manuscript. https://extranet.sioe.org/uploads/sioe2021/grandori.pdf

36. Greif A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

37. Greif A., Mokyr J. (2017). Cognitive rules, institutions, and economic growth: Douglass North and beyond. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 25—52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137416000370

38. Haack P., Sieweke J., Wessel L. (eds.) (2020). Microfoundations of institutions. In 2 vols. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

39. Hallett T., Hawbaker A. (2020). Bringing society back in again: The importance of social interaction in an inhabited institutionalism. In: P. Haack, J. Sieweke, L. Wessel (eds.). Microfoundations of institutions. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 317—336. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X2019000065B024

40. Hallett T., Ventresca M. (2006). Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s “Patterns of industrial bureaucracy”. Theory and Society, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 213—236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-006-9003-z

41. Hindriks F., Guala F. (2015). Institutions, rules, and equilibria: A unified theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 459—480. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000496

42. Hodgson G. (2014). On fuzzy frontiers and fragmented foundations: Some reflections on the original and new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 591—611. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000307

43. Hodgson G. M. (2016). The future of work in the twenty-first century. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 197—216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2016.1148469

44. Hodgson G. M., Samuels W. J., Tool M. R. (eds.) (1994). The Elgar companion to institutional and evolutionary economics. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.

45. Jacobsen M. H. (2019). Introduction: The coming of critical and cultural interactionisms. In: M. H. Jacobsen (ed.). Critical and cultural interactionism insights from sociology and criminology. New York: Routledge, pp. 1—11. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315141640-1

46. Keen S. (2021). The appallingly bad neoclassical economics of climate change. Globalizations, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 1149—1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1807856

47. Kesting S., Negru I., Silvestri P. (2020). Institutional analysis and the gift: An introduction to the symposium. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 665—674. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000223

48. Klaes M. (2004). Evolutionary economics: In defence of ‘vagueness’. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 359—376. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178042000252992

49. Klein P. A. (1989). Institutionalism confronts the 1990s. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 545—553. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1989.11504920

50. Lari T. (2021). When does complementarity support pluralism about schools of economic thought? Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 322—335. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2021.1945659

51. Latour B. (2005). Re-assembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

52. Lawrence T., Suddaby R., Leca B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 52—58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387222

53. Lawson T. (2015). Essays on the nature and state of modern economics. London; New York: Routledge.

54. Lok J. (2020). Theorizing the ‘I’ in institutional theory: Moving forward through theoretical fragmentation, not integration. In: A. D. Brown (ed.). The Oxford handbook of identities in organizations. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 732—749. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827115.013.16

55. Lounsbury M., Anderson D. A., Spee P. (eds.) (2021). On practice and institution: Theorizing the interface. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X202070

56. Ménard C. (2020). Please, open the windows! Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 427—428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000089

57. Ménard C., Shirley M. (2014). The future of new institutional economics: From early intuitions to a new paradigm? Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 541—565. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741400006X

58. Ménard C., Shirley M. M. (2018). Introduction. In: C. Ménard, M. M. Shirley (eds.). A research agenda for new institutional economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, рр. 1—5. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112512.00006

59. Ménard C., Shirley M. M. (2022). Advanced introduction to new institutional economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar

60. Mokyr J. (2016). A culture of growth: The origins of the modern economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1wf4dft

61. Morgan G., Campbell J. L., Crouch C., Pedersen O. K., Whitley R. (eds.) (2010). The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199233762.001.0001

62. Myrdal G. (1978). Institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 771—783. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1978.11503577

63. Nelson R. R., Dosi G., Helfat C., Pyka A., Saviotti P., Lee K., Dopfer K., Malerba F., Winter S. (2018). Modern evolutionary economics: An overview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108661928

64. Newen A., De Bruin L., Gallagher S. (2018). 4E cognition: Historical roots, key concepts, and central issues. In: A. Newen, L. De Bruin, S. Gallagher (eds.). The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 4—18.

65. Ostrom E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

66. Panhans M. T., Schumacher R. (2021). Theory in closer contact with industrial life: American institutional economists on competition theory and policy. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 17, No. 5, рр. 781—798. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000357

67. Petracca E., Gallagher S. (2020). Economic cognitive institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 747—765. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000144

68. Poteete A., Janssen M., Ostrom E. (2010). Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

69. Pratt M. G., Sonenshein S., Feldman M. S. (2022). Moving beyond templates: A bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 211—238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120927466

70. Reinert E. S. (2007). How rich countries got rich and why poor countries stay poor. London: Constable.

71. Rodrik D. (2015). Economics rules: The rights and wrongs of the dismal science. Oxford: WW Norton & Company.

72. Rosenbaum E. (2021). Mental models and institutional inertia. Journal of Institutional Economics, [forthcoming]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413742100059X

73. Rutherford M. (1994). Institutions in economics: The old and the new institutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

74. Samuels W. J. (ed.) (1988). Institutional economics. Vol. I-III. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.

75. Samuels W. J. (1995). The present state of institutional economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 569—590. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035331

76. Schmidt V. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1—25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X

77. Schmidt V. A. (2019). Where might the next generation of progressive ideas and programmes come from? Contemporary discontents, future possibilities for Europe. In: P. Diamond (ed.). The crisis of globalization: Democracy, capitalism and inequality in the twenty-first century. London: I. B. Tauris, рр. 167—186.

78. Seckler D. (1975). Thorstein Veblen and the institutionalists: A study in the social philosophy of economics. Boulder: Colorado Associated University Press.

79. Seligson D., McCants A. (2021). Coevolving institutions and the paradox of informal constraints. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 359—378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000600

80. Shiller R. J. (2019). Narrative economics: How stories go viral and drive major economic events. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691189970

81. Shirley M. (2020). How should economists analyze institutions? Comments on David Skarbek, ‘Qualitative research methods for institutional analysis’. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 429—431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000053

82. Sindzingre A. N. (2021). Concept and causation: Issues in the modelling of institutions. Forum for Social Economics, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 194—213. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2016.1263230

83. Skarbek D. (2020). Qualitative research methods for institutional analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 409—422. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741900078X

84. Stanfield J. R. (1999). The scope, method, and significance of original institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 231—255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1999.11506154

85. Stilwell F. (2019). From economics to political economy: Contradictions, challenge, and change. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 35—62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12259

86. Storm S. (2021). Cordon of conformity: Why DSGE models are not the future of macroeconomics. International Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 77—98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2021.1929582

87. Teorell J., Coppedge M., Lindberg S., Skaaning S.-E. (2019). Measuring polyarchy across the globe, 1900—2017. Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 71—95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-018-9268-z

88. Thomson J. (2017). Resisting gendered change: Feminist institutionalism and critical actors. International Political Science Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 178—191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116677844

89. Tool M. R. (ed.) (1988). Evolutionary economics. Vol. I-II. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.

90. Tool M. R. (ed.) (1993). Institutional economics: Тheory, method, policy. Boston; Dordrecht; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

91. Vandenberg P. (2002). North’s institutionalism and the prospect of combining theoretical approaches. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 217—235. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/26.2.217

92. Voigt S. (2013). How (not) to measure institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1—26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137412000148

93. Voigt S. (2019). Institutional economics. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108573719

94. Waller W. (2020). The Journal of Economic Issues in the calculable future of original institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 329—333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2020.1743140

95. Whalen C. J. (2020). Post-Keynesian institutionalism: Рast, present, and future. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 71—92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-019-00150-4

96. Whalen C. J. (2022). Storytelling and institutional change: The power and pitfalls of economic narratives. In: C. J. Whalen (ed.). Institutional economics perspectives and methods in pursuit of a better world. New York: Routledge, pp. 247—270. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003160434-13

97. Wilber C. K., Harrison R. S. (1978). The methodological basis of institutional economics: Pattern model, storytelling, and holism. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 61—89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1978.11503505

98. Williamson O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.

99. Williamson O. E. (1996). Economic evolution: An enquiry into the foundations of new institutional economics. Economic Journal, Vol. 106, No. 6, pp. 1791—1793. https://doi.org/10.2307/2235224

100. Williamson O. E. (2008). Foreword. In: E. Brousseau, J.-M. Glachant (eds.). New institutional economics: A guidebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. xxiii- xxxvii.

101. Wisman J. D., Rozansky J. (1991). The methodology of institutionalism revisited. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 709—737. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1991.11505198


Дополнительные файлы

Рецензия

Для цитирования:

Фролов Д.П. Будущее плюралистичной институциональной теории. Вопросы экономики. 2022;(4):45-69. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-4-45-69

For citation:

Frolov D.P. The future of pluralistic institutional theory. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2022;(4):45-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-4-45-69

Просмотров: 642


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)

Некоммерческое партнерство «Редакция журнала „Вопросы экономики“»
119606, Москва, Проспект Вернадского, д. 84, РАНХиГС, 1-й учебный корпус, офис 1132
Тел./факс: 8 (499) 956-01-43
mail@vopreco.ru

Яндекс.Метрика

создано и поддерживается NEICON
(лаборатория Elpub)